WEARFITS vs Fittingbox vs WANNA / Perfect Corp

Foot-scan sizing with Fit Confirmed signal

The first and only AR try-on platform with production-grade sizing.

WEARFITS is the only AR virtual try-on platform that ships sizing. The customer scans their foot with the phone camera, the platform produces real foot measurements (length, width, instep), maps them against the SKU's internal geometry, and renders a per-SKU fit heatmap with a Fit Confirmed signal before add-to-cart. The result is what AR try-on has been missing for seven years — the answer to "will it actually fit" rather than just "what does it look like."

Fittingbox does not ship sizing for footwear. WANNA / Perfect Corp does not ship sizing. WEARFITS is the first.

Web, mobile, and in-store mirror from one API

The only vendor running all three surfaces from a single integration.

WEARFITS and Fittingbox are the only two vendors in this comparison shipping in-store AR mirror. Fittingbox runs mirror in its eyewear product line; the footwear vertical is web-only. WEARFITS runs web, mobile, and in-store mirror from the same integration across both shoes and bags — meaning retailers do not maintain three separate engagements (one per surface), three separate ingestion pipelines, or three separate vendor contracts.

This is the architectural cost most evaluations underestimate.

Bulk roll-out without scanning every SKU

2D-to-3D pipeline plus hybrid 3rd-party ingestion — the only path that scales linearly with catalogue size.

WEARFITS generates the 3D digital twin from a single product photo. There are no CAD files to source, no physical samples to ship to a scanning rig, no manual 3D-designer adjustment after ingestion. When a brand has existing 3D assets (CAD, photogrammetry scans, third-party 3D files), WEARFITS ingests them too, in the same workflow, without surcharge.

This is the only architecture in the comparison that scales linearly. Zara has rolled out thousands of SKUs across both shoes and bags via the WEARFITS API. Fittingbox uses photogrammetry-led 3D digitization done in-house — the full catalogue is scannable, but every SKU requires a physical sample shipped to Fittingbox's scanning facility, and no third-party 3D files are accepted. WANNA / Perfect Corp requires CAD or paid photogrammetry plus mandatory manual 3D-designer adjustment per SKU — and pricing is not publicly disclosed, only available on application.

Loading time 2–3 seconds. Mid-tier Android parity. Low battery drain.

The 2022 legacy stack is not just a style-coverage limitation — it shows up in everything shoppers feel.

The 2022 legacy stack creates loading times of 6–8 seconds on the WANNA / Perfect Corp tracker, degraded performance on mid-tier Android devices (where the 2026 device fleet actually skews), and measurable battery drain within a shopping session. WEARFITS retrains its ML on the current device fleet and product geometry. Fittingbox's footwear ML inherits its eyewear lineage of continuous refinement and lands closer to modern. WANNA / Perfect Corp's tracker has been on the 2022 legacy stack since the Farfetch acquisition.

Zara, Hockerty, CCC, Converse

From $49/month Shopify install to Inditex-tier enterprise rollout.

WEARFITS spans the full retailer scale spectrum: medium Shopify stores onboard their first hundred SKUs through the standard Shopify app at $49/month; enterprise retailers like Zara have rolled out thousands of SKUs across both shoes and bags via the WEARFITS API. The Hockerty deployment is documented with a measurable conversion increase on the live storefront. CCC and Converse are named retail customers.

Fittingbox is enterprise at scale in eyewear but the footwear vertical is in early customer-build phase. WANNA / Perfect Corp's named customer roster from 2022–2024 has seen significant decline in active deployments post-acquisition.